Back when. We realized a lot in having a grace about "language barrier" while being students of real life and being actors in geopolitics. One thing was that Hamas was an extremist group, a relative "little" to the "big" Islam. And even "Nato" was a minor to a major war. So, because that's more about alliances and liaisons to Allies and Axis. Really, all gets subsumed by military in war. And war is unusual times. Most everything gets rearranged linguistically. Understanding that helped us plow through a lot of civilian tensions that were ripping us apart. The language for people and stuff changes as the material world becomes resources, damages, and casualties. The focus changes into survival of a nation's military. If and when that survives, only then is there additional life possible.
Said to be the sundial of savages, the shadows where one can read the absence of the thing represented. Only during daylight of course.
Tuesday, October 21, 2025
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Battle-tested to transactional
"We weren't running," some jetted away unified on message. "And we're not chasing you," a media rep said. ...
-
A couple nights good sleep free from political noise and the sentiment is settle back down. Slogans come and go. So do transitions and ...
-
It's not about gender for me. I care about men and women and children doing America as America. I think to be too specific-cause de...
-
The minutes might have such a notation. Emptying the bathtub. One man literally lifted a realistic-baby babydoll off the accounting she...
No comments:
Post a Comment