It was one of the first pieces of narrative taken from someone's brain chatter, put on a piece of paper, and openly denied by a support group. One person affirmed the person's humanity with various evidence supporting the fact that the person was neither a terd nor mostly made up of fecal matter.
The person needed more offloading of internalized narrative so the group listened to some music and imagined power shields capable of deflecting further insult and verbal abuse.
For some people (i)resiliance(i) starts with something like that.
The question was, (i)Do you think AI can be resiliant?(i)
A couple people conferred and answered (i)yes(i). It was explained in the "simple terms" of replacing a negative with a positive, a negative with an affirmative. Programming such a "warrior" would put AI into the category of winning and losing humans who either survive or die.
No comments:
Post a Comment