Bbc reporting, Iran says "retaliation for attacks on its allies"

A nation can't "say" first of all.  Not even a good lead to article that then cited rev guard as saying.

Technically no "allies", another word perhaps, but

Way back,

It was determined that Iran, then, is a religion.  And they can burn all the good books in the world but we ain't trusting Allah as God.

  Houses of cards, every "political" org but for the King.

  That kind of sovereignty diff from traitors who inhibit their militaries through miles of policy all tangled up with bills/money.  The Supreme Court was not happy about that stuff entangling the entire court system.

  The Allied were like holding things for each other until solvency; another reason Trump was strongly suggesting pay up.  Ongoing war debts mount and suffocate prospects of anything different.  That's why Trump says, end it, our involvement in that way.

  Plus, world wars are different in the way things must be organized or structured.  Until the military "piece" is in place, command is more like a quilt and not properly top-down.  And in times of hot warring a quilt of defense is more like a pillow fort.  Which causes more emphasis on protecting self and property.  Like protecting State Law in lieu of swamped fed law.  Not, in lieu of, but as equally strong as it can be in flux.

  Other nations can take advantage of in flux, so

  Allied becomes crucial.